Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 28.06.2025 14:32

Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
If you believe in God, do you think God can save you from cancer?
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
Pharmacy group withholds endorsing CDC's latest vaccine recommendations - AOL.com
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
What is the best sunscreen for oily skin without a white cast?
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
Just in the last 5 years:
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
Let’s just make it real clear:
What’s next?
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
Walking This Many Steps Per Day Can Cut Your Risk Of Early Death - HuffPost
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
Sega Throws Shade At Mario Kart While Showing Off Sonic Racing: Crossworlds - Kotaku
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
Russia can stop this any time.
Thank you.
Your Gmail Inbox Is Running Slow. Do These Things to Fix It - WIRED